首页> 外文OA文献 >Internal Consistency, Test-Retest Reliability and Measurement Error of the Self-Report Version of the Social Skills Rating System in a Sample of Australian Adolescents
【2h】

Internal Consistency, Test-Retest Reliability and Measurement Error of the Self-Report Version of the Social Skills Rating System in a Sample of Australian Adolescents

机译:澳大利亚青少年样本中社交技能评估系统自我报告版本的内部一致性,重测信度和测量误差

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The social skills rating system (SSRS) is used to assess social skills and competence in children and adolescents. While its characteristics based on United States samples (US) are published, corresponding Australian figures are unavailable. Using a 4-week retest design, we examined the internal consistency, retest reliability and measurement error (ME) of the SSRS secondary student form (SSF) in a sample of Year 7 students (N = 187), from five randomly selected public schools in Perth, western Australia. Internal consistency (IC) of the total scale and most subscale scores (except empathy) on the frequency rating scale was adequate to permit independent use. On the importance rating scale, most IC estimates for girls fell below the benchmark. Test-retest estimates of the total scale and subscales were insufficient to permit reliable use. ME of the total scale score (frequency rating) for boys was equivalent to the US estimate, while that for girls was lower than the US error. ME of the total scale score (importance rating) was larger than the error using the frequency rating scale. The study finding supports the idea of using multiple informants (e. g. teacher and parent reports), not just student as recommended in the manual. Future research needs to substantiate the clinical meaningfulness of the MEs calculated in this study by corroborating them against the respective Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID).
机译:社会技能评估系统(SSRS)用于评估儿童和青少年的社会技能和能力。虽然已发布了基于美国样本(US)的特征,但没有相应的澳大利亚数字。使用为期4周的重新测试设计,我们从5个随机选择的公立学校的7年级学生(N = 187)的样本中检查了SSRS中学生表格(SSF)的内部一致性,重新测试的可靠性和测量误差(ME)。在澳大利亚西部的珀斯。总评分的内部一致性(IC)和频率评定量表上的大多数子量表得分(同情心除外)足以允许独立使用。在重要性评定量表上,大多数IC对女孩的估计值均低于基准。对总秤和副秤的重测估计不足以可靠使用。男孩的总分得分(频率等级)的ME等于美国的估计值,而女孩的总得分的ME低于美国的误差。总分评分(重要等级)的ME大于使用频率等级量表的误差。该研究发现支持使用多个信息提供者(例如老师和父母的报告)的想法,而不仅仅是手册中推荐的学生。未来的研究需要通过对照各自的最小临床重要差异(MCID)来证实本研究中计算出的ME的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号